India's net foreign direct investment (FDI) has turned negative in recent years, with a net outflow of $15 billion in FY25-26, despite strong gross FDI inflows. Experts Sudeep Kapadia and Keitan Dalal discuss the nuanced reality behind the headlines, highlighting that while the regulatory architecture is welcoming, on-ground issues like land availability, high logistics costs, and bureaucratic friction hinder large-scale manufacturing investments. They emphasize the need for a pro-business political narrative, sector-focused strategies, and simpler tax regimes to attract long-term, strategic FDI.
Summarized by Podsumo
India's net FDI turned negative in FY25-26 at -$15 billion, with gross FDI stagnating over five years; about 50% of recent FDI is via secondary buyouts by private equity, not primary capital for manufacturing.
Key on-ground barriers include scarcity of large, clean-title land parcels, high logistics costs (11-12% of GDP vs China's 8%), and a weak ecosystem for industrial clusters (India rated 5 vs China's 10 on cluster maturity index).
Tax friction remains a concern: the Vodafone and Tiger Global cases have eroded trust, while the sunset of the concessional 5% withholding tax on external borrowings adds costs. Experts advocate for a simple, permanent 10% tax rate for foreign investors to eliminate treaty dependency.
Political signaling matters: India's reluctance to publicly court business leaders contrasts with Trump's US, where a clear pro-business narrative is attracting capital back home. A dedicated 'Minister for FDI' is proposed to coordinate cross-ministerial efforts.
To reverse the trend, experts suggest focusing on 4-5 high-potential sectors (like green energy, semiconductors) and addressing soft issues such as judicial delays (64 lakh cases pending in high courts) and skill development to improve productivity.
"The mindset should be not to come and say, 'What wrong you did this summer.' The mindset should be to say, 'What frictions I can remove so that your business can prosper even better than it is today.'” — Sudeep Kapadia"
"Ease of doing business, unfortunately, sometimes the way the bureaucracy approaches it, I think the net result is reducing *unease* as opposed to creating ease.” — Keitan Dalal"
"Why would political leaders go to foreign countries, but businesses don't go with them? I think we should change it from our narrative point of view.” — Sudeep Kapadia"